In February 2024, Alice wrote to the UK Government about their decision not to expand the list of acceptable voter ID. Alice is a trans woman who has no photo ID because “she has either been unable to afford the cost…or her mental health issues have presented a barrier to dealing with the administrative and bureaucratic hurdles necessary to do so.”
Alice said that by not expanding the list of acceptable ID, the UK Government was risking her human right to free elections and to be free from discrimination. She also said it was breaching the duty under the Equality Act to have due regard to the need to eliminate discrimination and advance equality.
Alice asked the courts for permission to bring a legal case on the issue, but this was refused. While the High Court didn’t address the Human Rights Act in its decision, it said that the equality claim was “unarguable” because the Government had done its duty by reviewing ID requirements (even though it ultimately decided not to change them) and because Alice is “able to obtain a [free] Voter Authority Certificate but apparently had failed to do so”. She therefore couldn’t argue that she was “personally or directly affected” by the decision not to expand the list of acceptable ID.