Consultation Response

Realising Rights in Practice: A Human Rights Response to SEND Reform

The UK’s Department for Education published an open consultation in February 2026 proposing reforms to the system that supports children and young people with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). BIHR submitted a co-produced response to the consultation, highlighting the importance of a human rights-based approach.

What did BIHR say?

Our consultation response recommends that the UK Government:

We are working to co-produce an Easy Read version of our consultation response, which we hope to share very soon.

1. Focuses on resourcing the current system.

Children, young people and families need their human rights to be real, not more complexity or paperwork. SEND reforms must be grounded in the rights and duties of the Human Rights Act (HRA).

2. Ensures the consultation process is fair and lawful.

The proposals have wide-ranging implications for legally protected human rights, and the reform process must genuinely support meaningful engagement.

3. Secures robust routes for families to challenge decisions.

We want the system to work well, but it is crucial that effective safeguards are available, providing families with fair and independent ways to speak up if they disagree with decisions.

4. Avoids creating a one-size-fits-all approach to SEND support.

Children and young people with SEND should get the support that’s right for them as individuals, rather than being grouped by standardised criteria and packages of support.

5. Supports people to be involved in decisions about their lives.

Children, young people, and families should be listened to when decisions are being made about support, and resources should not be prioritised over legally protected rights.

6. Equips schools with funding and support to realise rights.

Public authorities across the SEND system face extreme pressures already. The consequences of not getting the right support at the right time can have a long-term negative impact on children and young people.

"The current SEND system could work effectively for children and young people if it was fully implemented as set out in the law and the Code of Practice and if accountability mechanisms were strengthened."

Catriona Moore, Policy Manager, IPSEA (Independent Provider of Special Educational Advice) SEND Consultation Response

"More than anything, I want to remind the system that disabled children are just as deserving as anyone else, whatever their care and support needs to look like. Every child deserves an education, whether that is traditional or not. These proposals are heavily implying that disabled children deserve to be deprioritised and seen as less than."

Charli Clement, Autism and Mental Health Lived Experience Expert SEND Consultation Response

"Across all proposals, there is a recurring tension between system efficiency and individual rights. In practice, when systems are under strain, efficiency tends to take precedence. Reform must explicitly safeguard against this by ensuring that rights remain the starting point for all decision-making, not a consideration secondary to capacity."

Daisy Long, Chief Social Worker, DCC Interactive Ltd (DCC-i) SEND Consultation Response

"As someone with lived experience of the SEND system, both as a student and now as a Learning Support Assistant, lived experience should be part of the process from the beginning, not added after decisions have already been made. The people who will live with these reforms every day, students, families, SENDCos, teachers and support staff, need to be meaningfully involved in shaping them."

Hanna Gawron, Lived Experience Expert and Learning Support Assistant in a Secondary School SEND Consultation Response

"Frontline organisations supporting families know that even under the current system, families with legally enforceable EHCPs in mainstream schools struggle enormously to secure the provision their children are entitled to. Plans go unimplemented, annual reviews are missed, EHCP drafts aren't sent out (or not translated), complaints go unanswered. If this is the reality with the strongest legal protections available, replacing EHCPs with unenforceable ISPs in the same under-resourced settings will not improve outcomes."

Karen Torres, Advocacy, Research and Campaigns Manager, IRMO (Indoamerican Refugee and Migrant Organisation) SEND Consultation Response

Next steps and more information

BIHR will be following the process of SEND reform closely and adding insights from a human rights perspective.

We have produced a blog series about human rights and SEND, with articles spanning a wide range of issues and relevant rights.

If you work for a public authority or you are part of a community group that supports children, young people and families, and you would like to know more about human rights in SEND support, BIHR can provide support to boost knowledge and confidence in the Human Rights Act so it can be used to ensure people are treated with dignity, respect and fairness.